System and methods for automated segmentation of individual skeletal bones in 3D anatomical images

ABSTRACT

Presented herein, in certain embodiments, are approaches for robust bone splitting and segmentation in the context of small animal imaging, for example, microCT imaging. In certain embodiments, a method for calculating and applying single and hybrid second-derivative splitting filters to gray-scale images and binary bone masks is described. These filters can accurately identify the split lines/planes of the bones even for low-resolution data, and hence accurately morphologically disconnect the individual bones. The split bones can then be used as seeds in region growing techniques such as marker-controlled watershed segmentation. With this approach, the bones can be segmented with much higher robustness and accuracy compared to prior art methods.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to methods and systems of imageanalysis. More particularly, in certain embodiments, the inventionrelates to automatic bone splitting and segmentation from an anatomicalimage of a small subject (e.g., small animal, small mammal), e.g.,captured with a computed tomography (CT) scanner.

BACKGROUND

There is a wide array of technologies directed to in vivo imaging ofmammals—for example, bioluminescence, fluorescence, tomography, andmultimodal imaging technologies. In vivo imaging of small mammals isperformed by a large community of investigators in various fields, e.g.,oncology, infectious disease, and drug discovery.

In vivo micro computed tomography (hereafter, “microCT”) imaging, is anx-ray-based technology that can image tissues, organs, and non-organicstructures with high resolution, although higher-throughput imaging maymake beneficial use of lower resolution microCT imaging to speed imageacquisition and/or processing while maintaining acceptable accuracy andimage detail. MicroCT has evolved quickly, requiring low dose scanningand fast imaging protocols to facilitate multi-modal applications andenable longitudinal experimental models. In vivo imaging often involvesthe use of reagents, such as fluorescent probes, for non-invasivespatiotemporal visualization of biological phenomena inside a liveanimal. Multi-modal imaging involves the fusion of images obtained indifferent ways, for example, by combining FMT, PET, MRI, CT, and/orSPECT imaging data.

Image analysis applications and/or imaging systems generally allow forvisualization, analysis, processing, segmentation, registration andmeasurement of biomedical images. These applications and systems alsoprovide volume rendering tools (e.g., volumetric compositing, depthshading, gradient shading, maximum intensity projection, summed voxelprojection, signal projection); manipulation functions (e.g., to defineareas of structures of interest, delete unwanted objects, edit imagesand object maps); and measurement functions (e.g., for calculation ofnumber of surface voxels, number of exposed faces, planar area of aregion, and estimated surface area or volume of a region).

Conventional object segmentation algorithms typically rely onmorphological approaches to perform bone splitting. In these approaches,watershed transformation is typically applied to the gray-scale imagedata or the distance transform of the binary object mask. The watershedtransform separates the binary mask into labeled regions which representthe individual objects that make up the binary mask (as discussed, forexample, in F. Meyer, S. Beucher, J. Vis. Comm. Im. Rep. 1(1), 199021-46). Using this approach, the binary bone mask from FIG. 1 can beseparated and labeled as depicted in FIG. 2.

As evident in FIG. 2, this conventional segmentation approach suffersfrom limitations and drawbacks which result in under-segmentation,over-segmentation, and most importantly, incorrect placement of thesplit lines/planes. The latter occurs mainly because the combination ofdistance and watershed transforms place the split lines/planes on thethinnest connectors between the objects. However, the thinnestconnectors may or may not coincide with the bone joints. This issue canbe seen in the splitting of the femur from the pelvis in the resultsshown in FIG. 2.

While some existing morphological segmentation techniques may sometimesprovide adequate accuracy in high-resolution images of larger mammals(e.g., humans), where the spacing between the objects is larger than thevoxel resolution, their performance does not provide adequate accuracyneeded for further image processing when dealing with low-resolutiondata such as the dataset shown in FIG. 1, e.g., for imaging of smallanimals (e.g., mice, rats, voles, rabbits, and similarly-sized animals).Micro-CT images typically have voxel sizes of about a few microns to afew hundred microns (e.g., between 4.5 microns to 200 microns). In lowerresolutions (e.g., corresponding to voxel sizes of 40 microns orhigher), partial volume effects can cause two separate objects to getmorphologically connected in the binary mask, which can, for examplecause significant loss in segmentation accuracy, as shown in FIG. 2. Insome embodiments, the image of the subject (e.g., a small mammalsubject, e.g., a mouse) has a resolution such that each voxel of theimage corresponds to a volume at least 40 microns in each dimension.

While a variety of techniques have been used for splitting andsegmentation of large bones in medical (human) CT imaging (e.g., asdescribed by U.S. Pat. No. 8,306,305 B2 by Porat, et al.), there remainsa need for robust methods for bone splitting and segmentation for smallanimal micro-CT imaging. For example, Porat et al. note in U.S. Pat. No.8,306,305 B2 that the morphological operations described therein may notbe appropriate if the method is intended to be used for the skull, sincethe operations would cause the entire brain to be included in the bonecomponent. Porat et al. further describe that thin parts of thevertebrae may be less than one voxel thick, and the average density ofthe voxels that contain them may be less than their actual density andthat these bones may not be found in their entirety.

A significant difference between the bone splitting and segmentation inlarge and small animals is that the spatial resolution offered bymicro-CT is not always sufficiently higher than the thickness ordimensions of the bones in small animals, such as laboratory mice. Thiscan pose further challenges on bone segmentation considering partialvolume effects. Thus, there is a need for improved and accurate methodsfor automated object segmentation especially in cases such as smallanimal micro-CT data where high resolution images are not alwaysavailable, or are too time-consuming or computationally complex toobtain.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Presented herein, in certain embodiments, are approaches for robust bonesplitting and segmentation in the context of small animal imaging. Insome embodiments, the segmentation techniques presented herein areuseful in anatomical imaging platforms, including micro-CT. In certainembodiments, a method for calculating and applying single and hybridsecond-derivative splitting filters to gray-scale images and binary bonemasks prior to the watershed segmentation is described. These filterscan accurately identify the split lines/planes of the bones even forlow-resolution data, and hence accurately disconnect the individualbones. The split bones can then be used as seeds for marker-controlledwatershed segmentation. With this approach, the bones can be segmentedwith much higher robustness and accuracy compared to prior art methods.This improved performance stems from the ability of the splittingfilters to accurately locate the separation points/planes of the bonesusing second-derivative functions.

Automated segmentation of skeletal bones, detected from gray-scaleanatomical images via thresholding or similar methods, can allow forbone visualization, morphometric and statistical analyses, and shape,feature, and disease studies. For example, local thresholding techniquescan be used to detect the skeletal bones in a micro-CT volume as shownin FIG. 1. The end goal is to segment each bone as an individual object;therefore, it is desirable to automatically split the binary mask shownin FIG. 1 into a segmentation map of differentiated individual bones.Accurate, automated anatomical characterization of specific bones orgroups of bones can then be made from the segmentation map ofdifferentiated bones for classification, diagnosis, or other researchpurposes.

The technique can also be used for automated segmentation of othernetwork-like objects or materials depicted in images. For example, thetechniques described herein can be used for differentiating discretemineral types depicted in a three-dimensional geological image formineral mapping or for oil and gas development/exploration.

One aspect described herein is directed to a method of performing imagesegmentation to automatically differentiate individual bones in an imageof a skeleton or partial skeleton of a subject, the method includingreceiving, by a processor of a computing device, an image (e.g., atwo-dimensional image or a three-dimensional image, e.g., athree-dimensional image comprising voxels, e.g., a gray-scale image)(e.g., an in vivo image, an ex vivo image, or an in situ image) of asubject (e.g., a small mammal subject, e.g., a mouse) (e.g., obtained byan in vivo imaging system, e.g., a micro-CT imager); applying, by theprocessor, one or more second derivative splitting filters to the imageto produce a split bone mask for the image; determining, by theprocessor, a plurality of split binary components of the split bone maskby performing one or more morphological processing operations (e.g., byperforming connected component analysis and/or by identifying catchmentbasins using distance and watershed transforms); optionally,quantifying, by the processor, a volume of each split binary componentand eliminating one or more components having unacceptably small volume(e.g., eliminating one or more components having a volume below apredetermined threshold); and performing, by the processor, a regiongrowing operation (e.g., a marker-controlled watershed operation) usingthe split bone mask components as seeds, thereby producing asegmentation map differentiating individual bones in the image.

In some embodiments, the anatomical image is an in vivo image. In someembodiments, the anatomical image is an ex vivo image. In someembodiments, the anatomical image is an in situ image. In someembodiments, the image is a two-dimensional image or a three-dimensionalimage. In some embodiments, the image is a three-dimensional imagecomprising voxels. In some embodiments, the image is a gray-scale image.

In some embodiments, the subject is a small mammal subject. In someembodiments, the subject is a mouse. In some embodiments, the image isobtained by an in vivo imaging system. In some embodiments, the image isobtained by a micro-CT scanner.

In some embodiments, one or more morphological operations includesperforming connected component analysis and/or identifying catchmentbasins using distance and watershed transforms. In some embodiments,eliminating one or more components having unacceptably small volumeincludes eliminating one or more components having a volume below apredetermined threshold. In some embodiments, the region growingoperation includes a marker-controlled watershed operation.

In some embodiments, the one or more second derivative splitting filtersincludes at least one member selected from the group consisting of a LoG(Laplacian of Gaussian), a HEH (highest Hessian eigenvalue, withpreliminary Gaussian filtering), and a LEH (lowest Hessian eigenvalue,with preliminary Gaussian filtering).

In some embodiments, the method includes applying a plurality of secondderivative splitting filters to the image of the subject to produce thesplit bone mask. In some embodiments, the applying step includes foreach second derivative splitting filter being applied, producing afiltered image and identifying voxels of the filtered image withintensity higher or lower than a threshold (e.g., a predeterminedthreshold), thereby yielding a split binary mask identifying voxels inthe vicinity of a boundary region between adjacent bones; combining thesplit binary masks by performing one or more logical operations toreturn the split bone mask (which is a hybrid of the split binarymasks), with voxels near bone boundaries removed.

In some embodiments, the method also includes identifying, by theprocessor, one or more anatomical measurements (e.g., for diagnosticpurposes) using the segmentation map.

In some embodiments, the method includes, following the step ofproducing the segmentation map, accepting feedback from a useridentifying one or more segmented regions of the segmentation map forfurther refinement or recalculation and then: applying, by theprocessor, one or more second derivative splitting filters to portionsof the image corresponding to the one or more user-identified segmentedregions to produce a split bone mask; determining, by the processor,split binary components of the split bone mask; and performing, by theprocessor, a region growing operation using the split bone maskcomponents as seeds, thereby producing a refined or recalculatedsegmentation map differentiating individual bones in the image (e.g.,thereby providing additional splitting to correct for under-segmentationof the one or more regions identified by the user or thereby providingregion merging to correct for over-segmentation of the one or moreregions identified by the user, e.g., wherein the further refinement orrecalculation steps are performed using different splitter filtersand/or different parameters than previously used).

In some embodiments, the image of the subject (e.g., a small mammalsubject, e.g., a mouse) has a resolution such that each voxel of theimage corresponds to a volume at least 40 microns in each dimension.

In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more second derivativesplitting filters is applied using one or more rotational invariants ofspatial second partial derivatives of the voxel intensities of theimage, wherein the image is a three-dimensional gray-scale image.

Another aspect described herein is directed to a system including aprocessor and a memory having instructions stored thereon, wherein theinstructions, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:receive an image (e.g., a two-dimensional image or a three-dimensionalimage, e.g., a three-dimensional image comprising voxels, e.g., agray-scale image) (e.g., an in vivo image, an ex vivo image, or an insitu image) of a subject (e.g., a small mammal subject, e.g., a mouse)(e.g., obtained by an in vivo imaging system, e.g., a micro-CT imager);apply one or more second derivative splitting filters to the image toproduce a split bone mask for the image; determine a plurality of splitbinary components of the split bone mask by performing one or moremorphological processing operations (e.g., by performing connectedcomponent analysis and/or by identifying catchment basins using distanceand watershed transforms); optionally, quantify a volume of each splitbinary component and eliminating one or more components havingunacceptably small volume (e.g., eliminating one or more componentshaving a volume below a predetermined threshold); and perform a regiongrowing operation (e.g., a marker-controlled watershed operation) usingthe split bone mask components as seeds, thereby producing asegmentation map differentiating individual bones in the image.

In some embodiments, the one or more second derivative splitting filtersincludes at least one member selected from the group consisting of a LoG(Laplacian of Gaussian), a HEH (highest Hessian eigenvalue, withpreliminary Gaussian filtering), and a LEH (lowest Hessian eigenvalue,with preliminary Gaussian filtering).

In some embodiments, he instructions, when executed by the processor,further cause the processor to apply a plurality of second derivativesplitting filters to the image of the subject to produce the split bonemask, the applying step comprising: for each second derivative splittingfilter being applied, producing a filtered image and identifying voxelsof the filtered image with intensity higher or lower than a threshold(e.g., a predetermined threshold), thereby yielding a split binary maskidentifying voxels in the vicinity of a boundary region between adjacentbones; combining the split binary masks by performing one or morelogical operations to return the split bone mask (which is a hybrid ofthe split binary masks), with voxels near bone boundaries removed.

In some embodiments, the instructions, when executed by the processor,further cause the processor to identify one or more anatomicalmeasurements (e.g., for diagnostic purposes) using the segmentation map.

In some embodiments, the instructions, when executed by the processor,further cause the processor to, following the step of producing thesegmentation map, accept feedback from a user identifying one or moresegmented regions of the segmentation map for further refinement orrecalculation and then: apply one or more second derivative splittingfilters to portions of the image corresponding to the one or moreuser-identified segmented regions to produce a split bone mask;determine split binary components of the split bone mask; and perform aregion growing operation using the split bone mask components as seeds,thereby producing a refined or recalculated segmentation mapdifferentiating individual bones in the image (e.g., thereby providingadditional splitting to correct for under-segmentation of the one ormore regions identified by the user or thereby providing region mergingto correct for over-segmentation of the one or more regions identifiedby the user, e.g., wherein the further refinement or recalculation stepsare performed using different splitter filters and/or differentparameters than previously used).

In some embodiments, the image of the subject (e.g., a small mammalsubject, e.g., a mouse) has a resolution such that each voxel of theimage corresponds to a volume at least 40 microns in each dimension.

In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more second derivativesplitting filters is applied using one or more rotational invariants ofspatial second partial derivatives of the voxel intensities of theimage, wherein the image is a three-dimensional gray-scale image.

Another aspect described herein is directed to a non-transitory computerreadable medium having instructions stored thereon, wherein theinstructions, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:receive an image (e.g., a two-dimensional image or a three-dimensionalimage, e.g., a three-dimensional image comprising voxels, e.g., agray-scale image) (e.g., an in vivo image, an ex vivo image, or an insitu image) of a subject (e.g., a small mammal subject, e.g., a mouse)(e.g., obtained by an in vivo imaging system, e.g., a micro-CT imager);apply one or more second derivative splitting filters to the image toproduce a split bone mask for the image; determine a plurality of splitbinary components of the split bone mask by performing one or moremorphological processing operations (e.g., by performing connectedcomponent analysis and/or by identifying catchment basins using distanceand watershed transforms); optionally, quantify a volume of each splitbinary component and eliminating one or more components havingunacceptably small volume (e.g., eliminating one or more componentshaving a volume below a predetermined threshold); and perform a regiongrowing operation (e.g., a marker-controlled watershed operation) usingthe split bone mask components as seeds, thereby producing asegmentation map differentiating individual bones in the image.

Elements of embodiments described with respect to a given aspect of theinvention may be used in various embodiments of another aspect of theinvention. For example, it is contemplated that features of thedependent claims referring to one independent claim can be used inapparatus and/or methods of any of the other independent claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages ofthe invention will become more apparent and may be better understood byreferring to the following description taken in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 depicts bones of the lower limbs of a nu/nu mouse imaged by amicro-CT scanner that are detected and visualized using localthresholding techniques. The thresholding process results in a binarymask with unit-valued voxels in the bone area and zero-valued voxels innon-bone areas.

FIG. 2 depicts segmentation of the bones from FIG. 1 using existingdistance and watershed transform approach. In addition to over- andunder-segmentation issues, this approach cannot locate the split areasaccurately as evident in the pelvis-femur splits.

FIG. 3 depicts images of the Laplacian of a femur/pelvis joint of anu/nu mouse imaged in a micro-CT platform. FIG. 3 illustrates that aLaplacian filter enhances the contrast from bone to soft tissueespecially in the joints, considering their “concave up” behavior, inthe gray-scale image, according to an illustrative embodiment of thepresent disclosure. The top plot shows the Laplacian of the femur/pelvisjoint while the bottom plot depicts the gray-scale data of thefemur/pelvis joint.

FIG. 4 depicts the connected components of the bone mask from FIG. 1after Laplacian splitting outlined in FIG. 5, according to anillustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flow-chart showing a calculation and application ofLaplacian-based splitting filter to bone data, according to anillustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing steps associated with performingautomated segmentation using splitting filters, according to anillustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is an image depicting the production of seeds formarker-controlled watershed produced by removing small binary componentsof the split binary bone mask created by hybrid LAP-HEH splittingfilter, according to an illustrative embodiment of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 8 is an image that depicts a final segmentation result of automatedsplitting-based segmentation using the seeds from FIG. 7 and a hybridLAP-HEH splitting filter, according to an illustrative embodiment of thepresent disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an example network environment for use inthe methods and systems for analysis of micro-CT image data, accordingto an illustrative embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an example computing device and an examplemobile computing device, for use in illustrative embodiments of theinvention.

FIG. 11A depicts labeled seeds from LAP split masks, for use inillustrative embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 11B depicts labeled seeds from HEH split masks, for use inillustrative embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 11C depicts labeled seeds from hybrid LAP-HEH split masks, for usein illustrative embodiments of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

It is contemplated that systems, devices, methods, and processes of theclaimed invention encompass variations and adaptations developed usinginformation from the embodiments described herein. Adaptation and/ormodification of the systems, devices, methods, and processes describedherein may be performed by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art.

Throughout the description, where articles, devices, and systems aredescribed as having, including, or comprising specific components, orwhere processes and methods are described as having, including, orcomprising specific steps, it is contemplated that, additionally, thereare articles, devices, and systems of the present invention that consistessentially of, or consist of, the recited components, and that thereare processes and methods according to the present invention thatconsist essentially of, or consist of, the recited processing steps.

It should be understood that the order of steps or order for performingcertain action is immaterial so long as the invention remains operable.Moreover, two or more steps or actions may be conducted simultaneously.

The mention herein of any publication, for example, in the Backgroundsection, is not an admission that the publication serves as prior artwith respect to any of the claims presented herein. The Backgroundsection is presented for purposes of clarity and is not meant as adescription of prior art with respect to any claim.

As used herein, an “image”—for example, a three-dimensional (hereafter,“3D”) image of mammal—includes any visual representation, such as aphoto, a video frame, streaming video, as well as any electronic,digital or mathematical analogue of a photo, video frame, or streamingvideo. Any apparatus described herein, in certain embodiments, includesa display for displaying an image or any other result produced by theprocessor. Any method described herein, in certain embodiments, includesa step of displaying an image or any other result produced via themethod.

As used herein, “3D” or “three-dimensional” with reference to an “image”means conveying information about three dimensions. A 3D image may berendered as a dataset in three dimensions and/or may be displayed as aset of two-dimensional representations, or as a three-dimensionalrepresentation.

As used herein, “bone seed” refers to a set of voxels (e.g., connectedset of voxels) which is a part of a bone in a skeleton, and which can beused to find the complete, discrete bone by expanding it (e.g., byrepeatedly adding to it neighboring voxels which are likely to be voxelsof the same individual bone).

In some embodiments, a bone that can be segmented (e.g., isolated fromneighboring bones of a skeleton) is a bone of the legs (e.g., hips, kneecaps, femur, etc.), the arms, the hands, the feet, the fingers, thetoes, the skull, vertebrae, or collar bones. Some embodiments relate tosegmenting a long bone of a mammal (e.g., small mammal, e.g., rat,mice). In some embodiments, a long bone is selected from the following:femora, tibiae, fibulae, humeri, radii, ulnae, metacarpals, metatarsals,phalanges, and clavicles (e.g., of collar bones).

As used herein, a “mask” is a graphical pattern that identifies a 2D or3D region and is used to control the elimination or retention ofportions of an image or other graphical pattern.

As used herein, a “small animal” refers to small mammals that can beimaged with a micro-CT and/or micro-MR imager. In some embodiments,“small animal” refers to mice, rats, voles, rabbits, hamsters, andsimilarly-sized animals.

As used herein, applying a “second derivative splitting filter” is animage processing operation based on the second derivatives (orapproximations thereof) of the intensity of a 3D image, e.g., agray-scale 3D image, at each of a plurality of voxels. In someembodiments, a splitting filter is derived from Gaussian secondderivative filters selected from Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG), highestHessian eigenvalue with preliminary Gaussian filtering (HEH), and lowestHessian eigenvalue with preliminary Gaussian filtering (LEH).

Described herein are approaches for robust bone splitting andsegmentation in the context of small animal imaging. In certainembodiments, a method for calculating and applying single and hybridsecond-derivative splitting filters to gray-scale images and binary bonemasks prior to marker-controlled watershed segmentation is described. Insome embodiments, the role of a splitting filter is to essentiallyidentify and filter out voxels located in the joint areas between twoneighboring bones. Hence, these filters can accurately identify thesplit lines/planes of the bones even for low-resolution data, and hencemorphologically disconnect the individual bones. The split bones canthen be used as seeds for marker-controlled watershed segmentation. Withthis approach, the bones can be segmented with much higher robustnessand accuracy compared to prior art methods. This improved performancestems from the ability of the splitting filters to accurately locate theseparation points/planes of the bones using second-derivative functions.

In certain embodiments, the splitting filters can be defined based onthe second derivatives of a gray-scale 3D image in each voxel. In mostembodiments, rotational invariants can be used to make splittingindependent of bone orientations. Different rotational invariants ofspatial second partial derivatives of the gray-scale 3D image are known,such as Laplacian or eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix or theirfunctions. Laplacian is one which can be calculated without directlysolving the eigenvalue problem, and thus offers speed advantages overthe others—it is simply the trace of the Hessian matrix. Each rotationalinvariant can be used in a splitting filter. Furthermore, two or moresuch filters can be combined in a splitting algorithm to form a hybridsplitting filter. Voxels assigned a high value in a splitting filter canbe identified and removed from the binary bone mask. Then, the connectedcomponents of the split binary bone mask can be used as seeds (sources)for marker-controlled watershed segmentation.

The Laplacian, the highest Hessian eigenvalues, and the lowest Hessianeigenvalues are three filters found to be outstanding for splitting,when combined with the other steps of the segmentation methods describedherein. The Laplacian describes the extent and sign of concavity (e.g.,concave up vs. concave down) of a given voxel in its neighborhood. Inthe gap between two bones, the intensity is expectedly lower than onbone voxels in a “concave up” fashion; therefore, the Laplacian ispositive in the gap voxel. For example, this is demonstrated in FIG. 3for the femur/pelvis joint. The highest Hessian eigenvalue is alsosensitive to the gap between bones since it automatically quantifiesintensity in the direction across the valley where the intensity drop isbigger than in any other direction. The lowest Hessian eigenvalue issuited for detecting voxels which belong to a bone rather than a gapbetween two bones since it automatically quantifies intensity in thedirection across the bone.

The Laplacian operator is given by the sum of the second partialderivative of a function (e.g., gray-scale image intensity at a givenvoxel) with respect to each independent variable, for example, in threedimensions as given by:

${{\Delta\; f} = {\frac{\partial^{2}f}{\partial x^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2}f}{\partial y^{2}} + \frac{\partial^{2}f}{\partial z^{2}}}},$where x, y, and z are standard Cartesian coordinates of the xyz-space.

In certain embodiments, an image is processed using a Hessian matrix.The Hessian is a multiscale second order local structure of an image ora square matrix of second-order partial derivatives of a scalar-valuedfunction (e.g., gray-scale image intensity at a given voxel) thatdescribes the local curvature of the function. For example, applying aHessian filter to a 3D image comprising voxels (e.g., each voxel havinga gray-scale intensity value) may be performed by first applying a setof Gaussian second derivative filters to produce six second derivativeimages denoted by L_(xx), L_(yy), L_(zz), L_(xy), L_(xz) and L_(yz).Next, the 3×3 Hessian matrix is diagonalized for each voxel. The 3×3Hessian matrix of second order derivative filtered images is presentedas Matrix 1, below:L _(xx) L _(xy) L _(xz)L _(xy) L _(yy) L _(yz)L _(xz) L _(yz) L _(zz)Matrix 1

The diagonalization of the 3×3 Hessian matrix is an eigenproblem. Thesolution to the eigenproblem includes calculating three eigenvalueswhich describe the second order derivatives in the directions of threeprincipal components. The eigenvalues can be calculated by solving acubic equation. In certain embodiments, the directions of principalcomponents are unimportant, and calculation of eigenvectors can beskipped. The result of the diagonalization is the highest, the medium,and the lowest eigenvalues (H, M, L) for each voxel. In other words, inthe diagonalization step, three images are calculated from the siximages produced by application of the full set of Gaussian secondderivative filters. Example embodiments are described herein whichidentify the highest Hessian eigenvalue (HEH) and/or the lowest Hessianeigenvalue (LEH) for each voxel, and compare one or both of those values(or a hybrid of one or both of those values, and/or the Laplacian) to athreshold.

Calculation of Second-Derivative Splitting Filters

The splitting filters are established using spatial second-derivativeoperations on the gray-scale image. Examples of such functions includethe Laplacian (LAP), the highest, or the lowest eigenvalue of theHessian (HEH or LEH).

The filtering operation consists of identifying voxels in the gray-scaleimage with high LAP, HEH, or LEH values. These high-valued voxels can beidentified using empirical or automated histogram-based thresholdingapproaches. These voxels essentially include the bone boundaries orboundary points connecting neighboring bones which are of high interestfor bone splitting. Once these voxels are identified, they are mapped tothe binary bone mask. The mapped binary voxels can then be removed fromthe bone mask. This morphologically disconnects two closely spacedneighboring bones. The resulting binary mask is the split bone mask. Inother embodiments, the split bone mask can be directly calculated byidentifying the low-valued voxels in the splitting filter and mappingthem to the original bone mask. As an example, the image shown in FIG. 4depicts the connected components of the binary bone mask from FIG. 1after LAP-based splitting.

The flow-chart 500 shown in FIG. 5 summarizes the associated workflowfor calculating and applying the LAP splitting filter to the gray-scaleimage. The process begins with obtaining the gray-scale image 502. Asshown in FIG. 5, a Laplacian of the gray-scale image (e.g.,Gaussian-smoothed image) can be computed in step 504. In someembodiments, the gray-scale image is converted into a binary bone maskin step 508 using thresholding techniques. After the Laplacian of theimage (e.g., Gaussian-smoothed image) is computed in step 504, voxelswith Laplacian higher than a threshold determined based on histograms,cutting fraction, etc. are identified in step 506. Next, the identifiedvoxels with high-valued Laplacians based on cutting fraction,histograms, etc. are mapped to the binary bone mask in step 510. Asshown in FIG. 5, step 510 is carried out after step 508 and step 506.Next, the identified voxels in the binary bone mask are set to zero instep 512 to generate a split binary bone mask in step 514.

While LAP or HEH splitting filters can individually provide significantimprovements for bone splitting, they yield highly accurate splittingresults when combined. In certain embodiments, LAP filter and the HEHfilter can complement each other in bone splitting as the LAP filtersucceeds where the HEH filter fails and vice versa. Two or moresplitting filters can be combined by performing a voxel-by-voxel “AND”operation between their resulting split binary masks. As an example, thesplit binary bone mask from the flow-chart in FIG. 5 can be combinedwith a split binary bone mask from HEH splitting filter to produce ahybrid split binary bone mask, as shown, for example in FIG. 11C. Thisapproach can be used to obtain hybrid filters which combine the benefitsof two or more second-derivative splitting filters.

Steps for Preforming Automated Bone Segmentation Using Splitting Filters

The splitting-based bone segmentation can be done in four major steps asoutlined in the flow-chart 600 in FIG. 6. The segmentation processbegins with the binary mask of the bone in step 602. In the first step,the binary mask of the bone undergoes splitting in step 604 as describedin the previous section and outlined in the flow-chart 500 of FIG. 5.

Once splitting is performed in step 604, small binary components areremoved from the split mask in step 606. As shown in FIG. 4, occasionalover-splitting may result in small isolated binary components. However,these components can be easily removed by morphological operations. Forexample, in some embodiments, these components may be removed byidentifying the connected components of the binary split mask anddeleting components with a low number of voxels (e.g., below the minimumexpected bone size).

In some embodiments, split components of the split bone mask aredetermined through morphological processing (e.g., connected componentanalysis or catchment basins from distance and watershed transforms);

After the small binary components are removed from the split mask instep 606 (or after the morphological operations are performed, ifneeded), in some embodiments, the connected components are labeled instep 608. In other embodiments, split components of the split bone maskare labeled using watershed-based segmentation. After the labeling step608, the segmented bone mask is obtained in step 610 by applying regiongrowing techniques such as marker-controlled watershed to expand thelabeled split components of the split bone mask to fill the entirebinary bone mask and produce a labeled bone mask.

It can be noted that the connected components of the split binary masksare only used as seeds for marker-controlled watershed performed in step610. Thus, removal of small binary components in step 606, or ingeneral, removal of regions or parts of split objects, does not produceartifacts in the final segmentation results, which are obtained in step612. This is true as long as the connectivity of the major componentsare not jeopardized.

In some embodiments of step 608, the connected components of the binarymask can be identified and labeled using 6-order connectivity or higherorder connectivity. In some embodiments, the connected components of thebinary mask can be identified and labeled through connected componentanalysis, which is a digital image processing technique based on graphtraversal. This step produces the seeds for marker-controlled watershedas shown in FIG. 7. The split mask used for the labeled seeds shown inFIG. 7 was created by applying a hybrid LAP-HEH splitting filter to thegray-scale images of the dataset shown in FIG. 1.

In some embodiments of step 610, the labeled seeds are used in amarker-controlled watershed segmentation to produce the finalsegmentation map as shown in FIG. 8.

FIG. 8 lacks the limitations and drawbacks seen in FIG. 2 (e.g.,under-segmentation, over-segmentation, and incorrect placement of thesplit lines/planes). For example, FIG. 2 shows skeletal bones 200, whichhave been inaccurately segmented into bones 205-260 by conventionalmethods. In contrast, FIG. 8 shows skeletal bones 800, which areaccurately segmented into bones 805-860 via the methods describedherein. Examples of over-segmentation are seen in FIG. 2, such as intibia 205. In contrast, as seen in FIG. 8, tibia 805 has been accuratelysegmented into one bone using the methods described herein. Moreover,hips 225 and 230 have been over-segmented in FIG. 2. In contrast, hips825 and 830 have been accurately segmented into individual hips in FIG.8. Examples of under-segmentation, such as in vertebrae 240, 245, and250, are also seen in FIG. 2. In contrast, vertebrae 840, 845, and 850have been accurately segmented into vertebrate via the methods describedherein. Additional examples of under- and/or over-segmentation are seenin FIG. 2 in the knee caps 215 and 255 and femurs 205 and 260. Incontrast, FIG. 8 accurately segments knee cap 815 and 855 and femurs 805and 860.

In some embodiments, additional correction is needed through userinteraction. In such cases, either additional splitting is applied tocorrect for under-segmentation, or region merging is performed tocorrect for over-segmentation. In some embodiments, following the stepof producing the segmentation map, the method includes acceptingfeedback from a user identifying one or more segmented regions of thesegmentation map for further refinement and recalculation. In someembodiments, following accepting the user feedback, the method includesapplying, by the processor, one or more second derivative splittingfilters to portions of the image corresponding to the one or moreuser-identified segmented regions to produce a split bone mask. In someembodiments, following applying the one or more second derivativesplitting filters, the method includes determining, by the processor,split binary components of the split bone mask. In some embodiments,following determining the split binary components of the split bonemask, the method includes performing, by the processor, a region growingoperation using the split bone mask components as seeds, therebyproducing a refined or recalculated segmentation map differentiatingindividual bones in the image. In some embodiments, producing therefined or recalculated segmentation map includes thereby providingadditional splitting to correct for under-segmentation of the one ormore regions identified by the user. In some embodiments, producing therefined or recalculated segmentation map includes thereby providingregion merging to correct for over-segmentation of the one or moreregions identified by the user, e.g., wherein the further refinement orrecalculation steps are performed using different splitter filtersand/or different parameters than previously used.

Applications

As discussed above, in certain embodiments, the application for thesplitting-based segmentation comprises 3D small animal bonesegmentation. Hybrid second-derivative splitting filters, such asLAP-HEH, can separate the binary bone mask into connected componentswhich accurately seed the individual bones as seen in FIGS. 7 and 11C.Considering the level of accuracy and robustness that splitting filterscan bring to object segmentation, especially for 3D images, there is avariety of different applications where these filters would be necessaryfor accurate automated segmentation. Examples include, but are notlimited to, 3D organ, fat, rock, or natural mineral/materialsegmentation. Also, gray-scale images produced from imaging platformsother than micro-CT, such as micro-MR imagers, can be used insplitting-based segmentation.

Hardware

FIG. 9 shows an illustrative network environment 900 for use in themethods and systems for image segmentation and analysis, as describedherein. In brief overview, referring now to FIG. 9, a block diagram ofan exemplary cloud computing environment 900 is shown and described. Thecloud computing environment 900 may include one or more resourceproviders 902 a, 902 b, 902 c (collectively, 902). Each resourceprovider 902 may include computing resources. In some implementations,computing resources may include any hardware and/or software used toprocess data. For example, computing resources may include hardwareand/or software capable of executing algorithms, computer programs,and/or computer applications. In some implementations, exemplarycomputing resources may include application servers and/or databaseswith storage and retrieval capabilities. Each resource provider 902 maybe connected to any other resource provider 902 in the cloud computingenvironment 900. In some implementations, the resource providers 902 maybe connected over a computer network 908. Each resource provider 902 maybe connected to one or more computing device 904 a, 904 b, 904 c(collectively, 904), over the computer network 908.

The cloud computing environment 900 may include a resource manager 906.The resource manager 906 may be connected to the resource providers 902and the computing devices 904 over the computer network 908. In someimplementations, the resource manager 906 may facilitate the provisionof computing resources by one or more resource providers 902 to one ormore computing devices 904. The resource manager 906 may receive arequest for a computing resource from a particular computing device 904.The resource manager 906 may identify one or more resource providers 902capable of providing the computing resource requested by the computingdevice 904. The resource manager 906 may select a resource provider 902to provide the computing resource. The resource manager 906 mayfacilitate a connection between the resource provider 902 and aparticular computing device 904. In some implementations, the resourcemanager 906 may establish a connection between a particular resourceprovider 902 and a particular computing device 904. In someimplementations, the resource manager 906 may redirect a particularcomputing device 904 to a particular resource provider 902 with therequested computing resource.

FIG. 10 shows an example of a computing device 1000 and a mobilecomputing device 1050 that can be used in the methods and systemsdescribed in this disclosure. The computing device 1000 is intended torepresent various forms of digital computers, such as laptops, desktops,workstations, personal digital assistants, servers, blade servers,mainframes, and other appropriate computers. The mobile computing device1050 is intended to represent various forms of mobile devices, such aspersonal digital assistants, cellular telephones, smart-phones, andother similar computing devices. The components shown here, theirconnections and relationships, and their functions, are meant to beexamples only, and are not meant to be limiting.

The computing device 1000 includes a processor 1002, a memory 1004, astorage device 1006, a high-speed interface 1008 connecting to thememory 1004 and multiple high-speed expansion ports 1010, and alow-speed interface 1012 connecting to a low-speed expansion port 1014and the storage device 1006. Each of the processor 1002, the memory1004, the storage device 1006, the high-speed interface 1008, thehigh-speed expansion ports 1010, and the low-speed interface 1012, areinterconnected using various busses, and may be mounted on a commonmotherboard or in other manners as appropriate. The processor 1002 canprocess instructions for execution within the computing device 1000,including instructions stored in the memory 1004 or on the storagedevice 1006 to display graphical information for a GUI on an externalinput/output device, such as a display 1016 coupled to the high-speedinterface 1008. In other implementations, multiple processors and/ormultiple buses may be used, as appropriate, along with multiple memoriesand types of memory. Also, multiple computing devices may be connected,with each device providing portions of the necessary operations (e.g.,as a server bank, a group of blade servers, or a multi-processorsystem).

The memory 1004 stores information within the computing device 1000. Insome implementations, the memory 1004 is a volatile memory unit orunits. In some implementations, the memory 1004 is a non-volatile memoryunit or units. The memory 1004 may also be another form ofcomputer-readable medium, such as a magnetic or optical disk.

The storage device 1006 is capable of providing mass storage for thecomputing device 1000. In some implementations, the storage device 1006may be or contain a computer-readable medium, such as a floppy diskdevice, a hard disk device, an optical disk device, or a tape device, aflash memory or other similar solid state memory device, or an array ofdevices, including devices in a storage area network or otherconfigurations. Instructions can be stored in an information carrier.The instructions, when executed by one or more processing devices (forexample, processor 1002), perform one or more methods, such as thosedescribed above. The instructions can also be stored by one or morestorage devices such as computer- or machine-readable mediums (forexample, the memory 1004, the storage device 1006, or memory on theprocessor 1002).

The high-speed interface 1008 manages bandwidth-intensive operations forthe computing device 1000, while the low-speed interface 1012 manageslower bandwidth-intensive operations. Such allocation of functions is anexample only. In some implementations, the high-speed interface 1008 iscoupled to the memory 1004, the display 1016 (e.g., through a graphicsprocessor or accelerator), and to the high-speed expansion ports 1010,which may accept various expansion cards (not shown). In theimplementation, the low-speed interface 1012 is coupled to the storagedevice 1006 and the low-speed expansion port 1014. The low-speedexpansion port 1014, which may include various communication ports(e.g., USB, Bluetooth®, Ethernet, wireless Ethernet) may be coupled toone or more input/output devices, such as a keyboard, a pointing device,a scanner, or a networking device such as a switch or router, e.g.,through a network adapter.

The computing device 1000 may be implemented in a number of differentforms, as shown in the figure. For example, it may be implemented as astandard server 1020, or multiple times in a group of such servers. Inaddition, it may be implemented in a personal computer such as a laptopcomputer 1022. It may also be implemented as part of a rack serversystem 1024. Alternatively, components from the computing device 1000may be combined with other components in a mobile device (not shown),such as a mobile computing device 1050. Each of such devices may containone or more of the computing device 1000 and the mobile computing device1050, and an entire system may be made up of multiple computing devicescommunicating with each other.

The mobile computing device 1050 includes a processor 1052, a memory1064, an input/output device such as a display 1054, a communicationinterface 1066, and a transceiver 1068, among other components. Themobile computing device 1050 may also be provided with a storage device,such as a micro-drive or other device, to provide additional storage.Each of the processor 1052, the memory 1064, the display 1054, thecommunication interface 1066, and the transceiver 1068, areinterconnected using various buses, and several of the components may bemounted on a common motherboard or in other manners as appropriate.

The processor 1052 can execute instructions within the mobile computingdevice 1050, including instructions stored in the memory 1064. Theprocessor 1052 may be implemented as a chipset of chips that includeseparate and multiple analog and digital processors. The processor 1052may provide, for example, for coordination of the other components ofthe mobile computing device 1050, such as control of user interfaces,applications run by the mobile computing device 1050, and wirelesscommunication by the mobile computing device 1050.

The processor 1052 may communicate with a user through a controlinterface 1058 and a display interface 1056 coupled to the display 1054.The display 1054 may be, for example, a TFT (Thin-Film-Transistor LiquidCrystal Display) display or an OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode)display, or other appropriate display technology. The display interface1056 may comprise appropriate circuitry for driving the display 1054 topresent graphical and other information to a user. The control interface1058 may receive commands from a user and convert them for submission tothe processor 1052. In addition, an external interface 1062 may providecommunication with the processor 1052, so as to enable near areacommunication of the mobile computing device 1050 with other devices.The external interface 1062 may provide, for example, for wiredcommunication in some implementations, or for wireless communication inother implementations, and multiple interfaces may also be used.

The memory 1064 stores information within the mobile computing device1050. The memory 1064 can be implemented as one or more of acomputer-readable medium or media, a volatile memory unit or units, or anon-volatile memory unit or units. An expansion memory 1074 may also beprovided and connected to the mobile computing device 1050 through anexpansion interface 1072, which may include, for example, a SIMM (SingleIn Line Memory Module) card interface. The expansion memory 1074 mayprovide extra storage space for the mobile computing device 1050, or mayalso store applications or other information for the mobile computingdevice 1050. Specifically, the expansion memory 1074 may includeinstructions to carry out or supplement the processes described above,and may include secure information also. Thus, for example, theexpansion memory 1074 may be provided as a security module for themobile computing device 1050, and may be programmed with instructionsthat permit secure use of the mobile computing device 1050. In addition,secure applications may be provided via the SIMM cards, along withadditional information, such as placing identifying information on theSIMM card in a non-hackable manner.

The memory may include, for example, flash memory and/or NVRAM memory(non-volatile random access memory), as discussed below. In someimplementations, instructions are stored in an information carrier and,when executed by one or more processing devices (for example, processor1052), perform one or more methods, such as those described above. Theinstructions can also be stored by one or more storage devices, such asone or more computer- or machine-readable mediums (for example, thememory 1064, the expansion memory 1074, or memory on the processor1052). In some implementations, the instructions can be received in apropagated signal, for example, over the transceiver 1068 or theexternal interface 1062.

The mobile computing device 1050 may communicate wirelessly through thecommunication interface 1066, which may include digital signalprocessing circuitry where necessary. The communication interface 1066may provide for communications under various modes or protocols, such asGSM voice calls (Global System for Mobile communications), SMS (ShortMessage Service), EMS (Enhanced Messaging Service), or MMS messaging(Multimedia Messaging Service), CDMA (code division multiple access),TDMA (time division multiple access), PDC (Personal Digital Cellular),WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access), CDMA2000, or GPRS(General Packet Radio Service), among others. Such communication mayoccur, for example, through the transceiver 1068 using aradio-frequency. In addition, short-range communication may occur, suchas using a Bluetooth®, Wi-Fi™, or other such transceiver (not shown). Inaddition, a GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver module 1070 mayprovide additional navigation- and location-related wireless data to themobile computing device 1050, which may be used as appropriate byapplications running on the mobile computing device 1050.

The mobile computing device 1050 may also communicate audibly using anaudio codec 1060, which may receive spoken information from a user andconvert it to usable digital information. The audio codec 1060 maylikewise generate audible sound for a user, such as through a speaker,e.g., in a handset of the mobile computing device 1050. Such sound mayinclude sound from voice telephone calls, may include recorded sound(e.g., voice messages, music files, etc.) and may also include soundgenerated by applications operating on the mobile computing device 1050.

The mobile computing device 1050 may be implemented in a number ofdifferent forms, as shown in the figure. For example, it may beimplemented as a cellular telephone 1080. It may also be implemented aspart of a smart-phone 1082, personal digital assistant, or other similarmobile device.

Various implementations of the systems and techniques described here canbe realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry,specially designed ASICs (application specific integrated circuits),computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof.These various implementations can include implementation in one or morecomputer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on aprogrammable system including at least one programmable processor, whichmay be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data andinstructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storagesystem, at least one input device, and at least one output device.

These computer programs (also known as programs, software, softwareapplications or code) include machine instructions for a programmableprocessor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural and/orobject-oriented programming language, and/or in assembly/machinelanguage. As used herein, the terms machine-readable medium andcomputer-readable medium refer to any computer program product,apparatus and/or device (e.g., magnetic discs, optical disks, memory,Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs)) used to provide machine instructionsand/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readablemedium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal.The term machine-readable signal refers to any signal used to providemachine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor.

To provide for interaction with a user, the systems and techniquesdescribed here can be implemented on a computer having a display device(e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor)for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointingdevice (e.g., a mouse or a trackball) by which the user can provideinput to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide forinteraction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to theuser can be any form of sensory feedback (e.g., visual feedback,auditory feedback, or tactile feedback); and input from the user can bereceived in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

The systems and techniques described here can be implemented in acomputing system that includes a back end component (e.g., as a dataserver), or that includes a middleware component (e.g., an applicationserver), or that includes a front end component (e.g., a client computerhaving a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a usercan interact with an implementation of the systems and techniquesdescribed here), or any combination of such back end, middleware, orfront end components. The components of the system can be interconnectedby any form or medium of digital data communication (e.g., acommunication network). Examples of communication networks include alocal area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), and the Internet.

The computing system can include clients and servers. A client andserver are generally remote from each other and typically interactthrough a communication network. The relationship of client and serverarises by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of performing image segmentation toautomatically differentiate individual organs in an image of a subject,the method comprising: receiving, by a processor, a gray-scale image ofa subject; applying, by the processor, a plurality of second derivativesplitting filters to the image to produce split organ masks for theimage based on each second derivative splitting filter; combining thesplit organ masks for the image produced by each second derivativesplitting filter into a hybrid split organ mask for the image, using oneor more logical operations; determining, by the processor, a pluralityof split binary components of the hybrid split organ mask by performingone or more morphological processing operations; and performing, by theprocessor, a region growing operation using the split binary componentsof the hybrid split organ mask as seeds, thereby producing asegmentation map differentiating individual organs in the image.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the plurality of second derivative splittingfilters comprises members selected from the group comprising of aLaplacian of Gaussian (LoG), a highest Hessian eigenvalue withpreliminary Gaussian filtering (HEH), and a lowest Hessian eigenvaluewith preliminary Gaussian filtering (HEH).
 3. The method of claim 1,wherein, for each of the plurality of second derivative splittingfilters being applied, producing a filtered image and identifying voxelsof the filtered image with intensity higher or lower than apredetermined threshold, thereby yielding a split binary maskidentifying voxels in the vicinity of a boundary region between adjacentorgans; and wherein combining the split organ masks using one or morelogical operations generates a hybrid split organ mask with voxels nearorgan boundaries removed.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:identifying, by the processor, one or more anatomical measurements usingthe segmentation map.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:receiving feedback from a user identifying one or more segmented regionsof the segmentation map for further refinement or recalculation andthen: applying, by the processor, one or more second derivativesplitting filters to portions of the image corresponding to the one ormore user-identified segmented regions to produce one or more additionalsplit organ masks; determining, by the processor, split binarycomponents for each of the additional split organ masks; and performing,by the processor, a region growing operation using the split binarycomponents of the additional split organ masks as seeds, therebyproducing a refined or recalculated segmentation map differentiatingindividual organs in the image.
 6. The method of claim 1, whereindetermining the plurality of split binary components of the hybrid splitorgan mask further comprises performing connected component analysisand/or identifying catchment basins using distance and watershedtransforms.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of theplurality of second derivative splitting filters is applied using one ormore rotational invariants of spatial second partial derivatives of thevoxel intensities of the image.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein theimage is an in vivo image.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the subjectis a small mammal subject.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein thegreyscale image is received from a micro-CT imager.
 11. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the organ comprises one or more bones.
 12. A systemcomprising: a processor; and a memory having instructions storedthereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, causethe processor to: receive a gray-scale image of a subject; apply aplurality of second derivative splitting filters to the image to producesplit organ masks for the image based on each second derivativesplitting filter; combine the split organ masks for the image producedby each second derivative splitting filter into a hybrid split organmask for the image, using one or more logical operations; determine aplurality of split binary components of the hybrid split organ mask byperforming one or more morphological processing operations; and performa region growing operation using the split binary components of thehybrid split organ mask as seeds, thereby producing a segmentation mapdifferentiating individual organs in the image.
 13. The system of claim12, wherein the plurality of second derivative splitting filterscomprises members selected from the group comprising of a Laplacian ofGaussian (LoG), a highest Hessian eigenvalue with preliminary Gaussianfiltering (HEH), and a lowest Hessian eigenvalue with preliminaryGaussian filtering (HEH).
 14. The system of claim 12, wherein, for eachof the plurality of second derivative splitting filters being applied,producing a filtered image and identifying voxels of the filtered imagewith intensity higher or lower than a predetermined threshold, therebyyielding a split binary mask identifying voxels in the vicinity of aboundary region between adjacent organs; and wherein combining the splitorgan masks using one or more logical operations generates a hybridsplit organ mask with voxels near organ boundaries removed.
 15. Thesystem of claim 12, wherein the instructions, when executed by theprocessor, further cause the processor to identify one or moreanatomical measurements using the segmentation map.
 16. The system ofclaim 12, wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor,further cause the processor to, receive feedback from a user identifyingone or more segmented regions of the segmentation map forfurther-refinement or recalculation and then: apply one or more secondderivative splitting filters to portions of the image corresponding tothe one or more user-identified segmented regions to produce one or moreadditional split organ masks; determine split binary components for eachof the additional split organ masks; and perform a region growingoperation using the split binary components of the additional splitorgan masks as seeds, thereby producing a refined or recalculatedsegmentation map differentiating individual organs in the image.
 17. Thesystem of claim 12, wherein the determining the plurality of splitbinary components of the hybrid split organ mask further comprisesperforming connected component analysis and/or identifying catchmentbasins using distance and watershed transforms.
 18. The system of claim12, wherein at least one of the plurality of second derivative splittingfilters is applied using one or more rotational invariants of spatialsecond partial derivatives of the voxel intensities of the image.
 19. Anon-transitory-computer readable medium having instructions storedthereon, wherein the instructions, when executed by a processor, causethe processor to: receive a gray-scale image of a subject; apply aplurality of second derivative splitting filters to the image to producesplit organ masks for the image based on each second derivativesplitting filter; combine the split organ masks for the image producedby each second derivative splitting filter into a hybrid split organmask for the image, using one or more logical operations; determine aplurality of split binary components of the hybrid split organ mask byperforming one or more morphological processing operations; and performa region growing operation using the split binary components of thehybrid split organ mask as seeds, thereby producing a segmentation mapdifferentiating individual organs in the image.
 20. The non-transitorycomputer readable medium of claim 19, wherein, for each of the pluralityof second derivative splitting filters being applied, producing afiltered image and identifying voxels of the filtered image withintensity higher or lower than a predetermined threshold, therebyyielding a split binary mask identifying voxels in the vicinity of aboundary region between adjacent organs; and wherein, combining thesplit organ masks using one or more logical operations generates ahybrid split organ mask with voxels near organ boundaries removed.